Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> Alex Karasulu wrote, On 7/21/2005 11:09 PM:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I talked to Nick the other day who is looking into the nlog4j and 
>> slf4j stuff for us.  He is trying to get this stuff up on ibiblio 
>> which is a bit more involved now because of the m2 dependence on 
>> POMs.  You cannot just upload a jar without hunting down the 
>> dependencies anymore.
>>
>> Anyhow this is going to take a little bit of time.  I think we can 
>> use commons-logging for now to add any logging lines we need and make 
>> the switch over when Nick is ready.  Meaning we can take our time and 
>> add this to 0.9.2 which I'd like to release soon after 0.9.1.  There 
>> are lots of bug fixes lined up for 0.9.2 whereas 0.9.1 is mostly 
>> architectural changes etc.
>>
>> So let's get 0.9.1 out there so our users can play with the latest 
>> changes.  Meanwhile we can fix issues and switch the logging 
>> mechanism for 0.9.2.
>>
>> If there are no objections I would like to start the release process 
>> immediately.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>
>
> Is this a vote or release announcement?  If it's the former, then it 
> would be nice to make the Subject more explicit and I would like to 
> submit a +1.
>
Not really a vote as if we need a vote.  I was just checking if anyone 
had an objection before cutting a release which is way overdue.  If 
someone has an objection then we could make it a vote however I saw no 
need for the formality especially considering the circumstances (new 
features).

Alex