Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of mboorshtein@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.202 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gUIQQYz84v4hPWIxWCJEKZ4zB4DsoT3SsFZjShF6/7zcerSekTSLQBhyqjQefgBzZLh2c5vV/zuoHdADbwXQU7qc3ZM5PMfnnra/mubiEJlvLowdorizbw1BG1T1qPcdfnEdmdA+HnYIIkqSF0+yg8WFkZ75YLXG9UbgMuz15lY=
Message-ID: <800df639050613063362dc9eb5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:33:20 -0400
From: Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein@gmail.com>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>,
	Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [apacheds] Nestable InterceptorChains
In-Reply-To: <768dcb2e05061304491a67d5ff@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <768dcb2e050613001771aac139@mail.gmail.com>
	 <800df639050613033670e97d73@mail.gmail.com>
	 <768dcb2e05061304491a67d5ff@mail.gmail.com>

So as in a "package" of interceptors?  For instance there are 4 or 5
interceptors that are "default" interceptors, so that you could say in
your configuration:

server.interceptors=3Ddefault,myinterceptor1,myinterceptor2,...

and default would be a pre-configured (or user configured) chain?  The
alternative would be

server.interceptors=3Dcontrols,schema,authorization,...,myinterceptor1,myin=
terceptor2,...

I could see where that would be usefull when packaging several
intercepts as a single unit.  The default interceptors can either be
hardcoded or there can be a "hardcoded.props" to store all
configuration for a base system.

I haven't looked on this roadmap, is there a GUI in the works?  I
suppose that would simplify the configuration.

Marc


On 6/13/05, Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> =20
> 2005/6/13, Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein@gmail.com>:=20
> > What was the original use case for nestable interceptor chains?
> =20
>  =20
> We could create custom interceptor which is actually a chain of
> sub-interceptors.=20
>  =20
> Trustin
> --=20
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/