Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80474 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2005 15:35:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2005 15:35:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 50882 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2005 15:35:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 50820 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2005 15:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 50807 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2005 15:35:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:35:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of aok123@bellsouth.net designates 205.152.59.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [205.152.59.72] (HELO imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:35:17 -0700 Received: from ibm68aec.bellsouth.net ([65.80.200.112]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050630153509.BSPZ26489.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm68aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:35:09 -0400 Received: from [172.16.1.3] (really [65.80.200.112]) by ibm68aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050630153508.FQWP29052.ibm68aec.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.3]> for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:35:08 -0400 Message-ID: <42C41105.5090309@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:34:29 -0400 From: Alex Karasulu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050329) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [apacheds] Which logging framework? References: <1120001071.4565.33.camel@wkslx01.iktek.com> <768dcb2e050629180879a15aee@mail.gmail.com> <42C35434.4080001@atlassian.com> <42C3E2E7.1090300@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <42C3E2E7.1090300@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N There seems to be no object to using straight log4j. I'll ask one more time before I start yanking out commons logging and putting in Log4J in it's stead. > > Is there a need for a vote or can we just close this thread and use > Log4J? I'm going to start applying Nick's patch so if anyone objects let me know now. Thanks, Alex