Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78773 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2005 16:09:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2005 16:09:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 70887 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2005 16:09:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 70833 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2005 16:09:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 70817 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2005 16:09:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:09:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of aok123@bellsouth.net designates 205.152.59.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [205.152.59.72] (HELO imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:09:57 -0700 Received: from ibm68aec.bellsouth.net ([65.80.200.112]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050623160949.QHWM26489.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm68aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:09:49 -0400 Received: from [172.16.1.3] (really [65.80.200.112]) by ibm68aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050623160949.CRGS29052.ibm68aec.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.3]> for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:09:49 -0400 Message-ID: <42BADEAF.5010009@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:09:19 -0400 From: Alex Karasulu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050329) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [apacheds] A final summary for the changes in 'db_refactor' branch before merging it back. References: <768dcb2e0506220741691ffe7f@mail.gmail.com> <200506231021.22047.soren.hilmer@tietoenator.com> In-Reply-To: <200506231021.22047.soren.hilmer@tietoenator.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Soren Hilmer wrote: >Hi, > >Do you have a timeframe for the "merging-back" activity? >I am asking because I am going to make a "SleepyCat Berkeley DB Java Edition" >backend implementation, and would like to do that against this new >implementation, so I will not have to do it twice. > >Have you considered using this (BD JE) backend instead of JDBM? As far as I >can understand it, the licensing seams okay, and it is a bit more mature (has >transactions for one). > > Yes a few times. JE actually appear after we had implemented a partition using JDBM. I think the biggest impediment to JE may be due to licensing. It is not ASL 2.0 compatible. Alex