Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46756 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2005 15:24:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2005 15:24:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 73981 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2005 15:24:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 73886 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2005 15:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 73871 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2005 15:24:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of justin.rudd@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.193 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:23:57 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1612055rng for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:23:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=esCAfUNm0V1zVdL3dtvrnLj1wjvzCx1Vxqb5WAbJ5ScHV4l62Kf6G/OpOXsgtS7m7cxqSWEbnpoZiIAN5yrlEMLzecsC0S5Uvmx9Nz+5WIK8ACAv/dOCbH5FdkznSUdoYTikgx2t0xYV8NWBovefMDJPBZohZOCTxdoomhf53j0= Received: by 10.38.149.63 with SMTP id w63mr1004625rnd; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.55 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2c4e58b1050613082343f100e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:23:45 -0700 From: Justin Rudd Reply-To: Justin Rudd To: Directory Dev Subject: [mina] DemuxingProtocolHandler Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is there any reason that DemuxingProtocolHandler doesn't extend ProtocolHandlerAdapter? It seems like this would make it easier to use DemuxingProtocolHandler because I could just create an instance, register my handlers, and then return it. --=20 Justin Rudd "Get the facts first. You can distort them later." - Mark Twain http://seagecko.org/thoughts/