directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen McConnell" <mcconn...@dpml.net>
Subject RE: [apacheds] Which logging framework?
Date Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:15:34 GMT
 
I would very much prefer SL4J any over of the other options as it properly
separates the logging API from the implementation.
 
Cheers, Steve.
 
 



  _____  

From: Trustin Lee [mailto:trustin@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, 1 July 2005 1:20 AM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: Re: [apacheds] Which logging framework?


I think we need to vote now.  Using Log4J can bring issues to other users
who use other logging frameworks like java.util.logging.  This is important
because ApacheDS are designed to be embeddable.  That's why I prefer SLF4J
or Commons Logging. 
 
2005/7/1, Alex Karasulu <aok123@bellsouth.net>: 

There seems to be no object to using straight log4j.  I'll ask one more
time before I start yanking out commons logging and putting in Log4J in 
it's stead.

 
Trustin
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/ 


Mime
View raw message