Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  b=RO0/Cdp5sYBIQGqnCwNPHnLfjXzOO8nvGDyILErV5fo4DPOhif9sKE8TeEURsw1Rk7Tu7sVz00ExNGayKy4nHb+kw6EX1JYDvtYRxaN1xiU9gF7u+G+jI7SgfAUakduKlXUsyesgKNnyjopZW+vQQX+dLqLAOAO+ajYgHvvdAYY=
  ;
Message-ID: <20050425143950.45972.qmail@web30702.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Interest in JXPlorer as a subproject of Directory
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Well, combining the 2 would be difficult (though
interesting).  For one the SQL Directory browser is
SWT based, not swing.  Second it's JLDAP based, not
JNDI.  As for management, your talking about a lot
more then a browser for that.

marc


--- "Noel J. Bergman" <noel@devtech.com> wrote:
> > You may also want to think about the SQL Directory
> > Browser
>
(http://www.octetstring.com/products/BridgeDriver.php).
> 
> Perhaps, if both codebases are available under ASF
> IP, there would be room
> to combined the best of both, as well as having the
> two of you contribute.
> 
> > i'm not really sure about the need to incorporate
> a
> > browser into the apacheds project?
> 
> Can provide a very nice admin interface for
> environments that are managed by
> the server.  And when you consider that we have
> support for DNS, DHCP,
> kerberos, and many other such protocols, in addition
> to plain LDAP, that
> could be quite powerful and useful.
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 
>