directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <aok...@bellsouth.net>
Subject Re: [release] Finishing up on 0.9
Date Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:28:40 GMT
Oh and another thing I need to figure out how to get a link on the main 
apache website for directory. 

Alex Karasulu wrote:

> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:21 -0400, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Any thoughts on what we have left with getting the 0.9 release done?
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>
> <snip/>
>
>>> Also as an aside I'm having the feeling that apacheds should really 
>>> be called "core" for the core JNDI (LDAP namespace) backing store.  
>>> Also we might want to separate out the ServerContext factory from 
>>> the main code which has deps on Kerberos and LDAP protocol providers.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Here are some ideas :
>> * clean docos and site are a must.
>>  
>>
> +1
> Ok so we are still in disarray here eh?
>
>> * +1 for kerberos
>>  
>>
> +1
>
>> * +1 for apacheds -> core
>>  
>>
> I may have jumped the gun with this exact name but something has to be 
> done since all is ApacheDS.  Is this code the core?  I'll just talk 
> about what I'm thinking and keep the discussion on another existing 
> thread.
>
>> * +1 for the separation of ServerContext
>>  
>>
> +1
>
>> * having a root project.xml would be really cool
>>
> -0
> Yeah might be cool but that presumes people are checking out at the 
> base of directory.   It also presumes they want to build only the 
> trunk which is the case 99 percent of the time even though it should 
> not be.   Brett gave several reasons why this should not be the case.
>
>> * what about using external definitions (svn) in order to ease the
>> trunks checkout?
>>  
>>
> +0
> I think Brett was doing something with this already.  He already did 
> one I beleive.  I don't really understand the value of this - just by 
> way of ignorance so if someone wants to educate me and anyone else 
> that would be cool.
>
>> * what about a bin directory in which we can have a apacheds.sh and
>> apacheds.bat that start the server?
>>  
>>
> Yeah I like this idea.  It would be good to have init scripts 
> especially since ApDS will run as a daemon.
>
> Alex
>
>


Mime
View raw message