Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-5081-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 23744 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 15:03:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 15:03:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 50514 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2005 15:03:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50468 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2005 15:03:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@directory.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@directory.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.directory.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50454 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2005 15:03:42 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of trustin@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.200 as permitted sender)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.200)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:03:39 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so1799788wri
        for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:03:37 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=Ryt8VtNeJ6T3iPh/sH2Z+1bnDVJRNwHRk7yLJJStsgcjQS2FxsYrW9VY/z0nlbvYf8ebUuGzxO+7/cpnGh9fiaqfec4hHyrOpIVerREaYQjl1zvQkYqjmTHR9L/KZd/b0Qw94i3qibtstMl3kdNnSMXNIVxtWEdVYglyGcnE15s=
Received: by 10.54.39.76 with SMTP id m76mr2832235wrm;
        Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.21.58 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <768dcb2e05032207031c81d58@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:03:29 +0900
From: Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>,
	Vinod Panicker <vinod.p@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [mina] Performance issues
In-Reply-To: <a8f18ca30503220352129ae5db@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <a8f18ca305032121187458d804@mail.gmail.com>
	 <768dcb2e0503212250357a13bc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a8f18ca3050321230412e33c0d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a8f18ca305032123101d75bd89@mail.gmail.com>
	 <768dcb2e050322014169a4e484@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a8f18ca305032201473d1601d2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a8f18ca30503220352129ae5db@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi Vinod,

> It seems like the issue is in the Connector.  When I used a non-mina
> based client running in a single thread to connect to the mina based
> server, it works fine.

I found a serious flaw that will degrade SocketConnector performance. 
I checked in the fix into trunk. Could you retry?

> The server runs out of memory after a bit over 8000 connections.

What was max heap size?  Does this mean we have to lessen MINA's
memory consumption?

<snip/>

Thanks,
Trustin.
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/