Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69002 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2005 01:22:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2005 01:22:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 27026 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2005 01:22:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26979 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2005 01:22:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26966 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2005 01:22:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_SBL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of trustin@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.204 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:22:19 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so114780wri for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:22:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=lYiwJqBkeA/sznVggcFLu5GyXchpPG2oLuIwLOEhNCZ8U7E6taZ1m0t3aWq1fdXkSQbRyXAit9bSTeY83Xn3rSoyYp6OW9AIK041S3HcnbdflGH8ipsbx/jnKYM/YBtJ+1wbuU2o7QjRcs9vBaNxkjWanvc1OEXDPuIfV7yt3JA= Received: by 10.54.45.41 with SMTP id s41mr344040wrs; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.21.58 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:22:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <768dcb2e050308172233f1872b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 01:22:17 +0000 From: Trustin Lee Reply-To: Trustin Lee To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Do we want to jump to JDK 1.5 (was: Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project mina (in module mina) failed) In-Reply-To: <422DDD39.6070805@bellsouth.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <422d7a7a.23e9fae9.23e5.19efSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com> <768dcb2e0503080327296b28f0@mail.gmail.com> <422DD9DF.5020302@apache.org> <768dcb2e050308090329e36977@mail.gmail.com> <422DDD39.6070805@bellsouth.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:13:29 -0500, Alex Karasulu wrote: > I think we need to make a decision about whether or not we want to > support JDK 1.5 and what this means for backwords compatability. > > What are the pros and cons at this point? > > I don't think its practical using the server without SSL so I don't mind > jumping to 1.5. If it does not happen today it will in the next 6 > months I think. > > I still have not started using the new features that arrived in 1.4 :( > but this is another story. If we want SSL support for JDK 1.4, we'll have to program our own SSLEngine which is tough. :) But I don't think it is impossible. People must have not tried this because it is already there in Java 5. What matters is the time it takes. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/