Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1509 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2005 18:00:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2005 18:00:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 11984 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2005 18:00:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 11944 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2005 18:00:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 11931 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2005 18:00:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of aok123@bellsouth.net designates 205.152.59.70 as permitted sender) Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (HELO imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:00:32 -0800 Received: from [172.16.1.7] ([65.80.200.112]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050317180030.CTSH12676.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.7]> for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:00:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4239C5BE.4090900@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:00:30 -0500 From: Alex Karasulu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Tests naming References: <777DDD941E46D41181B300508BAE014F0DDD41B1@synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com> <4239C457.40801@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4239C457.40801@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dude I realize this stuff is crap. Do whatever kind of demolition is necessary to get the test cases working and named as you see fit. We just want to make sure we're decoding PDU's in LDAP correctly. So if you wanna rewrite things or just refactor to use your generated PDU and simplify - go for it. Whatever you do so long as we reach the goal of making these test free of snacc4j is fine by me. Thanks for dealing, Alex