Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1925 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 21:01:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 21:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12789 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2005 21:01:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 12746 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2005 21:01:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 12732 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2005 21:01:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from lakermmtao07.cox.net (HELO lakermmtao07.cox.net) (68.230.240.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:01:41 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (really [68.0.219.149]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050316210138.ZVTQ19214.lakermmtao07.cox.net@[192.168.1.3]> for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:01:38 -0500 Message-ID: <42389EAD.2040304@apache.org> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:01:33 -0500 From: Enrique Rodriguez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [kerberos] ApacheDS with Kerberos inside? References: <42386E17.6080304@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <42386E17.6080304@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alex Karasulu wrote: > Enrique, > > For the 0.9 release I'd like to include Kerberos in the server if you're > up to it. This means having it dormant unless it's turned on using some > master property key list server.kerberos.on or something consistent with > the keys we use already. > You want shoot for it? Then we can talk about what goes into it next. No problem. It runs fine on our home networks and I'm already getting reports of people building and running it. It has been well tested for interop with the most popular OS's. -enrique > > -- Alex >