Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86418 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 06:05:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 06:05:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 95559 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2005 06:05:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95429 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2005 06:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95415 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2005 06:05:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of aok123@bellsouth.net designates 205.152.59.73 as permitted sender) Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (HELO imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:05:07 -0800 Received: from [172.16.1.7] ([65.80.200.112]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050316060505.YEUB2829.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.7]> for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:05:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4237CC91.2010309@bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:05:05 -0500 From: Alex Karasulu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [asn1] Why do we still have a snacc4j dep in ber project? References: <4237C0AA.8040109@bellsouth.net> <1110950363.684.3.camel@agilis.homelinux.com> In-Reply-To: <1110950363.684.3.camel@agilis.homelinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vincent Tence wrote: >I removed Snacc4j dep from ldap-provider. I didn't know we had other >subprojects dependent on Snacc. I'll take a look at the ber suproject. >Any other suspect I should investigate? > > > That should be about it. Thanks man! Once your done let me know and I'll retire the code. Perhaps we need a retirement area as opposed to using a sandbox. For some stupid reason that's what I had done with apseda. I'll fix that later. Alex >-- Vincent > >On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 00:14 -0500, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > >>Hey Vince, >> >>I thought you wacked this. I tried blowning away the snacc4j stuff but >>it made tests fail. Am I loosing my mind? >> >>Alex >> >>