From directory-dev-return-4705-apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Mar 03 01:21:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16694 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2005 01:21:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2005 01:21:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 48667 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2005 01:21:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48447 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2005 01:21:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48383 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2005 01:21:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=PLING_PLING,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_SBL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of trustin@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.205 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:21:50 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so346091wri for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:21:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gLYEHupfFn8eVYRQnYTmnV9zUyEFGGYERTlPoxxkGrFlS4qBJEXOz9+JoTcrjLkuyZ0a2Uplw6mzMWEtEAlpzUoyuTHWNPL5Pw/l0D7+YJYi+k8O26qc1ARx7l3ovk5gEriSF+4pnhRcBm3UpdD9SnluSwpKFKhx+bp8C++k2GY= Received: by 10.54.65.3 with SMTP id n3mr38756wra; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.21.58 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:21:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <768dcb2e050302172155a4fb4e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:21:47 +0000 From: Trustin Lee Reply-To: Trustin Lee To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: We are now a TLP guys!!! (FW: ASF Board Summary for February 23, 2005) In-Reply-To: <42264C08.8050905@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050224212622.GA16326@lyra.org> <768dcb2e0503020749a3665c@mail.gmail.com> <1109789126.17910.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1109791160.21280.3.camel@localhost> <1109799448.14364.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <8dd4018b050302142329169c59@mail.gmail.com> <42264686.3020408@apache.org> <8dd4018b0503021514761d6e05@mail.gmail.com> <42264C08.8050905@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:28:08 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > For the benefit of those who weren't involved at that point or who, like > me, have a short memory - we've been there already. > > Here is a sumary of the reasons for the current name: > - - The existing name, Eve, had trademark concerns as did many others > within the project. > - - Anything LDAPish is out because the scope of the server goes beyond > LDAP. > - - There is already a strong brand in Apache, so there is not a great > need to develop a new one > - - Many of the names don't convey what the product is: Apache Directory > Server does. This would hamper recognition. > > I personally don't feel another name change is going to bring a benefit, > but it would have the following detriments: > - - some poor sucker would need to trawl subversion -again- and change > all the site references, artifact names, directories, etc. > - - lose any recognition already gained from the 0.8 release > - - have to delay going public on the TLP until the name can be properly > considered, checked and implemented. > > I wouldn't be adverse to a name change later if it is felt that will > strengthen the recognition of the product without any harm, and > something comes up that meets all the criteria above, but I think a > better time for that is probably around a 1.0 mark where there is > already momentum. But I also think sticking with Apache Directory Server > is just fine as well. > > Hope this helps. > > Cheers, > Brett > > Brennan Stehling wrote: > > >So Covey is still holding strong? That is my favorite and the > >definitions seems to apply well. > > > > > >On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:04:38 +0100, Stephane Bailliez > > wrote: > > > >>Brennan Stehling wrote: > >> > >>>We should brainstorm on a good brand name which works well. > >>> > >>> > >>Appaloosa ? > >> > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCJkwIOb5RoQhMkRMRAo2fAKCR+QsKk1X/fLH+NsEredhMkGMixQCfWDFq > /f31WNDvV4W6FPyxhRBAINM= > =b/HA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/