directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enrique Rodriguez <erodrig...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [gump] done with it
Date Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:39:54 GMT
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> I'd prefer giving up on gump but if you guys wanna keep it and Brett is 
> cool with it its fine by me.  I'll +1 it until later :).  I'm just 
> anxious to start using Continuum.

Right, I don't care at all for Gump but if I don't have to maintain it, 
then what beef can I have with it.  A few Gump messages here and there 
won't bother me.

-enrique

> 
> Alex
> Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
> 
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>
>>>> Hence, we should support Continuum, but should not withdraw from GUMP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This has really been the plan all along. I will maintain the gump
>>> descriptors. However, Gump is not ever going to cut it as a continuous
>>> integration tool for individual projects, because AFAIK that's not its
>>> goals.
>>>
>>> As far as your previous points about how easy it is to work with gump -
>>> it's not a lot of fun, but its manageable. It's not something I think
>>> the whole team should have to put themselves through. I've made a Maven
>>> plugin that eases this.
>>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>>> So, as it stands - the best situation is to use them side by side, as
>>> you've said, and as far as I'm concerned that's what we'll do. Is
>>> everyone ok with this?
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 to Brett maintaining them side-by-side.
>>
>> -enrique
>>
>>>
>>> - - Brett
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>>
>>> iD8DBQFCOJSkOb5RoQhMkRMRAkpuAJ9rABM6P5KdPxQs0YzGs+WnN2lJSwCfRcJ1
>>> hO58SGmAWLlORpKC//cEE6U=
>>> =ps44
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message