directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <aok...@bellsouth.net>
Subject Re: [gump] done with it
Date Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:36:52 GMT
I'd prefer giving up on gump but if you guys wanna keep it and Brett is 
cool with it its fine by me.  I'll +1 it until later :).  I'm just 
anxious to start using Continuum.

Alex 

Enrique Rodriguez wrote:

> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>> Hence, we should support Continuum, but should not withdraw from GUMP.
>>
>>
>> This has really been the plan all along. I will maintain the gump
>> descriptors. However, Gump is not ever going to cut it as a continuous
>> integration tool for individual projects, because AFAIK that's not its
>> goals.
>>
>> As far as your previous points about how easy it is to work with gump -
>> it's not a lot of fun, but its manageable. It's not something I think
>> the whole team should have to put themselves through. I've made a Maven
>> plugin that eases this.
>>
> <snip/>
>
>> So, as it stands - the best situation is to use them side by side, as
>> you've said, and as far as I'm concerned that's what we'll do. Is
>> everyone ok with this?
>
>
> +1 to Brett maintaining them side-by-side.
>
> -enrique
>
>>
>> - - Brett
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>
>> iD8DBQFCOJSkOb5RoQhMkRMRAkpuAJ9rABM6P5KdPxQs0YzGs+WnN2lJSwCfRcJ1
>> hO58SGmAWLlORpKC//cEE6U=
>> =ps44
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


Mime
View raw message