directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <>
Subject Re: [asn1] Why do we still have a snacc4j dep in ber project?
Date Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:05:05 GMT
Vincent Tence wrote:

>I removed Snacc4j dep from ldap-provider. I didn't know we had other
>subprojects dependent on Snacc. I'll take a look at the ber suproject.
>Any other suspect I should investigate?
That should be about it.  Thanks man!

Once your done let me know and I'll retire the code.  Perhaps we need a 
retirement area as opposed to using a sandbox.  For some stupid reason 
that's what I had done with apseda.  I'll fix that later.


>-- Vincent
>On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 00:14 -0500, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>Hey Vince,
>>I thought you wacked this.  I tried blowning away the snacc4j stuff but 
>>it made tests fail.  Am I loosing my mind?

View raw message