Return-Path: 
 <directory-dev-return-4561-apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75674 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 16:11:09 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 16:11:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 65852 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2005 16:11:09 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65815 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2005 16:11:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:directory-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <directory-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List"
 <directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65800 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2005 16:11:08 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from synntm8.optimumgroup.com (HELO synntm33.optimumint.com)
 (207.236.211.98)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:11:07 -0800
Received: from synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com ([10.10.0.20]) by
 synntm33.optimumint.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:11:02 -0500
Received: by synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com with Internet Mail Service
 (5.5.2658.3)
	id <FKATGRTB>; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:11:02 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <777DDD941E46D41181B300508BAE014F0DDD4142@synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Tenc=E9=2C_Vincent=22?=
	 <vtence@optimuminformatique.com>
To: 'Apache Directory Developers List'
	 <directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Philosophy of failing tests
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:11:02 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2658.3)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2005 16:11:02.0493 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[9A01A8D0:01C51B54]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

No such thing can exist! That's mine. How do we get failing unit tests in
the first place in SVN? If we do however, I agree they should be kept
failing. It'll make visible that we have a problem and put pressure on the
team to deal with it.

- Vincent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:adc@toolazydogs.com]
> Sent: February 25, 2005 11:03 AM
> To: Apache Directory Developers List
> Subject: Philosophy of failing tests
> 
> 
> What is everyone's philosophy on failing unit tests?  I, for one, 
> believe that they should be left failing until they are fixed.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
> 
>