directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vincent Tence <vte...@videotron.ca>
Subject Re: Getting rid of snacc dependency in snickers test cases
Date Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:23:59 GMT
In this case, I will manually update the attributes order in the 
pre-computed PDUs to match the order produced by snickers. Any objection?

- Vincent

Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Vincent Tence wrote:
> 
>>> 5. Encoders generate PDUs that look equivalent yet are different from 
>>> snacc one's - a CHOICE order maybe?
>>
>>
>>
>> I meant SET not CHOICE
> 
> 
> Yep I gathered that.  The issue here is with SET there is no requirement 
> for perserving order.  Snacc jumbles things up unpredicatably due to the 
> HashMap it uses for storing a SET.  Take a look at the Snacc generated 
> code for specific constructs and you'll see just how she behaves.
> 
> Cheers,
> Alex


Mime
View raw message