directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <>
Subject Re: Getting rid of snacc dependency in snickers test cases
Date Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:18:51 GMT
Vincent Tence wrote:

>> 5. Encoders generate PDUs that look equivalent yet are different from 
>> snacc one's - a CHOICE order maybe?
> I meant SET not CHOICE

Yep I gathered that.  The issue here is with SET there is no requirement 
for perserving order.  Snacc jumbles things up unpredicatably due to the 
HashMap it uses for storing a SET.  Take a look at the Snacc generated 
code for specific constructs and you'll see just how she behaves.


View raw message