Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62683 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 03:14:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 03:14:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 43225 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 03:14:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43189 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 03:14:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43174 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2005 03:14:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO f1.bali.ac) (211.24.132.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:14:04 -0800 Received: from 192.168.0.132 ([203.121.47.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by f1.bali.ac (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j053MZnK017294 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:22:36 +0800 From: Niclas Hedhman Organization: Private To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [apache directory server] How to release the server? Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:13:29 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20050104230313.VIZB2042.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <20050104230313.VIZB2042.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501051113.29129.niclas@hedhman.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:03, Alex Karasulu wrote: > The Apache Directory Server (ADS) can come in two configurations: > > 1) The first standard configuration is as an executable jar with only the > LDAP protocol. > > 2). Another configuration is as a standalone executable jar with Kerberos > and LDAP protocols together so the server can be both a directory server > and authentication server in one. Here the Kerberos sevice stores realm > and configuration information in the directory and exposes its > configuration via LDAP. However note that for security the LDAP port can > be shut off while still storing the realm within the directory - yeah this > sounds strange I know but its an option. > > With these configurations shall we release a single jar for #1, #2 or for > both? I recommend releasing both for example as: I belong in the camp that likes many Jar files, since that makes "scale right" more easily achievable. Cocoon is a great example. > ads-${version}.jar, and > > ads-krb5-${version}.jar or ads-kerberos-${version}.jar, whatever... > > WDYT? "ads-" is IMHO too diffuse (and like Noel, give me all kinds of other associations). "directory-" is a better choice. All IMVHO, of course. Cheers Niclas -- --------------- Everyone has a photographic memory, some just don't have film. - Steven Wright +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.dpml.net | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+