directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tencé, Vincent" <vte...@optimuminformatique.com>
Subject RE: ADS vs Directory vs Server :)
Date Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:15:17 GMT
Sounds excellent overall.

About the package names though, I'm not sure I understand all the subtleties
but directory.server looks more consistent and reminds of Apache Directory
Server.

- Vincent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:aok123@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: January 6, 2005 12:58 AM
> To: Apache Directory Developers List
> Subject: Re: ADS vs Directory vs Server :)
> 
> 
> Brett Porter wrote:
> 
> >Quoting Alex Karasulu <aok123@bellsouth.net>:
> >  
> >
> >>+ Email Subject Prefix: [server]
> >>+ Apache Directory Server SVN Folder: server
> >>+ JIRA Subproject: DIRSERVER
> >>- Package Name: org.apache.ldap.server
> >>Executable jar with bundled deps: dir-server-${version}.jar
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >The only reason I was confused about package was that I 
> thought the server did
> >more than just ldap. 
> >
> Yeah that's true but the code that is not LDAP specific is not in the 
> heart of the server and kept in separate packages/subprojects.  These 
> non-LDAP addons are more like 'components' that snaps in like the 
> Kerberos 'component' for example.
> 
> >Anyway, this is all good - go for it.
> >  
> >
> Coolio I'll start soon after some sleep ... :)
> 
> Thanks for the recommendations they did help.
> 
> Alex
> 

Mime
View raw message