directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen McConnell" <>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Directory project releases II
Date Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:21:51 GMT
Assumption is correct.
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Steitz [] 
Sent: 05 January 2005 00:45
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Directory project releases II
I assume comments below are about the candidate [naming] dist.  Thanks.
-----Original Message----- 
From: Berin Loritsch [] 
Sent: Tue 1/4/2005 6:47 AM 
To: Apache Directory Developers List 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Directory project releases II
Stephen McConnell wrote:

>[ ] +1 Approve the request to release
>[x] -1 Reject the request to release
>[ ] +0 Abstain
>1. wrong license in distribution
It's not the ASL 2.0?  We need to fix that.  Where did you notice the
ASL 2.0 license missing?
psteitz: That is my fault.  The licenses in the source were changed last
year, as was license.xml, but I must have missed LICENSE.txt.  Alex fixed it
in svn and I fixed the candidate distro last night.

>2. no javadoc package in the dist
psteitz: The javadoc is in the binary dist only.  Could be added to source.

>3. directory has not exited incubator and so long as this project
>   is in incubator it isn't real
At this point in the game I don't think either of these are a blocker.
Think of it as an early access release.


"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build
bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce
bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
                - Rich Cook

View raw message