Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46194 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2004 19:58:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2004 19:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 64972 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2004 19:58:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64910 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2004 19:58:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64894 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2004 19:58:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mail-06.iinet.net.au (HELO mail.iinet.net.au) (203.59.3.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:58:14 -0800 Received: (qmail 7856 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2004 19:58:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.14?) (203.217.70.69) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 19 Dec 2004 19:58:10 -0000 Message-ID: <41C5DD4E.1070703@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:58:06 +1100 From: Brett Porter User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [ldap] Need volunteer from another timezone :-) References: <41C5C2DF.7000306@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <41C5C2DF.7000306@bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N IIRC, it would be fixed by using a UTC timezone in the class itself, but I wasn't sure what effect that would have. I think the comment I added attempted to explain this. I can work with you on this to test some fixes. - Brett Alex Karasulu wrote: > Hi, > > The following test case is failing because I probably messed up and > made it timezone sensitive doh! So I could setup another machine in > another timezone to test this out but I'm lazy. Can someone take a > look at this and see if they can fix the test case? I know the code > tested ironically is ok - its just the damn test case. > > Thanks, > Alex > >