directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <>
Subject Re: [naming] release bundle
Date Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:05:45 GMT
Hi Phil,

Thanks for the work on this. A couple of minor comments:
- is /source or /binaries really the right top level directory? I would 
have thought incubator-directory-naming-0.8 and 
incubator-directory-naming-0.8-src was more standard?
- is there a need for individual md5s in the binary dist?
- not sure if the versions belong on the individual component 
directories in the source - they might be better the same as in source 

I assume this was handrolled? Any thoughts on what is needed to be able 
to automate it?


Phil Steitz wrote:

> I have put a candidate release bundle up at
> Assuming others are OK with the contents, I will tag, branch and roll 
> a final like this.
> As discussed, there is just one source and binary dist.  The binary 
> dist includes all of the jar artifacts and full api docs together. All 
> of the required notices are in the archives as well as the jars 
> (thanks, Alex!).
> I am OK releasing this separately or as part of a bundle.
> Feedback -- especially bugs, problems, absurdities -- most welcome.
> Phil

View raw message