Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21934 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 21:28:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 21:28:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 51632 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 21:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51562 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 21:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51536 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2004 21:28:29 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.40.203.202] (HELO ensim1.25oz.com) (216.40.203.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:28:28 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (h002078d1eba8.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.206.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by ensim1.25oz.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iANLpwsG006144 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:51:58 -0500 Message-ID: <41A3AB6E.3080501@apache.org> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:28:14 -0500 From: Enrique Rodriguez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: I'd like to start helping out here References: <41A3997D.3050401@d-haven.org> <41A3A4A0.9080509@apache.org> <41A3A6EB.4070407@d-haven.org> In-Reply-To: <41A3A6EB.4070407@d-haven.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Loritsch wrote: > Enrique Rodriguez wrote: >> Berin Loritsch wrote: >> Detection of both of these scenarios should be encapsulated in the >> Kerberos ProtocolProvider, but with denial performed as close to the >> wire as possible. >> >> Additionally, Kerberos admins should be able to clear denied Clients >> via management interface, so there should be a way to notify of a >> cleared address, too. This usually happens due to misconfigured clients. >> > I personally would start with a windowed blackout time. Sounds good. I agree a windowed blackout time should be default. The misconfiguration scenario I describe is a special case, when an admin setting up a client makes a mistake and it is specific to configuring Kerberos. Waiting 20 minutes would be a huge inconvenience and restarting the services may not be acceptable. -enrique