Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48987 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2004 17:21:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Nov 2004 17:21:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 68702 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2004 17:21:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68667 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2004 17:21:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68654 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2004 17:21:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO f2.hedhman.org) (202.187.40.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:21:54 -0800 Received: from f2.hedhman.org (f2.hedhman.org [127.0.0.1]) by f2.hedhman.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAQHLokH013695 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 01:21:51 +0800 From: Niclas Hedhman Organization: Private To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: Maven build error for directory-naming core Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 01:21:48 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <95F1CCA52E317C49AB7AA71B16E8988B0C23BC@mail2.tsd.biz> <200411270042.13139.niclas@hedhman.org> <41A761E9.80107@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <41A761E9.80107@bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411270121.48086.niclas@hedhman.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Saturday 27 November 2004 01:03, Alex Karasulu wrote: > Now really? If this is the case that's great. How do we verify this > loophole? For JavaMail the license text is; A. Software Internal Use and Development License Grant. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including, but not limited to Section B (Java Technology Restrictions) of these Supplemental Terms, Sun grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited license to reproduce internally and use internally the binary form of the Software complete and unmodified for the sole purpose of designing, developing and testing your Java applets and applications intended to run on the Java platform ("Programs"). Maybe I was wrong (and broken this license on a few hundred occassions), as it doesn't mention re-dsitrbute at all. (maybe text have changed over the years) OTOH, it could also be interpreted as it would be Ok for ASF to download and make available for ASF development, but not re-distribution to other parties. "internally" is also not defined, and if _I_ download on behalf of the entire Java developer and user community, or mankind for that matter, can I then say "internal use" being within planet earth? -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+