Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36132 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 21:50:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 21:50:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 3975 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 21:50:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3933 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 21:50:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3917 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2004 21:50:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.36.202] (HELO web53807.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.36.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:50:49 -0800 Received: (qmail 31016 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2004 21:50:45 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=mbtUNg8qRnWYVX1rduKtaFtMlsGEC4wMuADbAIC/Cd3NI0wk37L2Yy3i6Eb3xc/DgZshmJfQJa+5+K/bBuv8xHXIChMRjFQd9f6tBsuc9+bO8KWOcL47MzLMqJAv7TaesABK8nm6nRxurWNU9tlevRNQICGuZbW8E9ZhQu9A81k= ; Message-ID: <20041123215044.31014.qmail@web53807.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.15.247.175] by web53807.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:50:44 PST Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:50:44 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Wegner Subject: Re: Embedding Eve Was: To release or not to release? To: Apache Directory Developers List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Henri, Have you considered using DSML files instead of .property files? DSML is a much better fit since it really is the LDAP tree structure expressed in XML. Having a DSML back end (or using the DSML JNDI Provider) would be a slick solution. --Marty --- Henri Yandell wrote: > > Just to underline: > > I want a JNDI server which gets its data from commons-config; and not > just > use the JndiConfiguration part of commons-config (which I really need to > > learn more about). > > In effect, I want the Eve database to be based on a directory structure > of > .properties files. Simple-JNDI does this, but it supports very little of > > the JNDI API and I really don't want to reinvent the wheel. > > It might be a bit stupid as I'm basically going to have: > > Commons-config-as-database -> Eve/Directory Naming -> > Jndi-Commons-Config > > Advantages being the ability to switch to LDAP over time; and the global > > nature of JNDI for configuration. IoC is okay in terms of passing a > Config > class around, but I see no reason not to still back that Config with > JNDI. > > Hen > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Brett Porter wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I use directory naming for in memory JNDI + commons-configuration in > > production, it works just fine :) > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > > > >> > >> Hope so, I want to kill simple-jndi, which is what I currently use as > a way > >> to embed a JNDI server for local configuration. Though, a big part is > that > >> it sits on top of static XML/property files. > >> > >> What kind of files would you make for Eve? My todo list has: attach > >> commons-configuration to directory-naming, though I've no idea > whether it's > >> workable. Does Eve have this stuff already? > >> > >> Hen > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >