Return-Path: 
 <directory-dev-return-1886-apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3012 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 18:19:46 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 18:19:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 58602 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2004 18:19:45 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 58544 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2004 18:19:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:directory-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:directory-dev-subscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: "Apache Directory Developers List"
 <directory-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List"
 <directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 58528 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2004 18:19:44 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [207.236.211.98] (HELO synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com)
 (207.236.211.98)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:19:43 -0700
Received: by synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com with Internet Mail Service
 (5.5.2656.59)
	id <SR28DMBT>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:19:39 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <777DDD941E46D41181B300508BAE014F091E7CE0@synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Tenc=E9=2C_Vincent=22?=
	 <vtence@optimuminformatique.com>
To: 'Apache Directory Developers List'
	 <directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [SEDA] Some questions and idea about current SEDA API design
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:19:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

<snip/>

> > 5. IMHO, SEDA could be separated with multi-layered thread pool for
> > generic event handling and its networking frontend (e.g. seda-event
> > and seda-networking). How do you think?
> 

<snip/>
 
> Anyone else have some thoughts regarding the approach to take?

To what extent our code overlaps with Berin's code based on Avalon event? Is
it worth investigating if we can consolidate work here or not? Just asking.

- Vincent