Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88888 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2004 21:38:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 21:38:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 76329 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2004 21:38:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75993 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2004 21:38:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Directory Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75916 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2004 21:38:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [205.152.59.67] (HELO imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 14:38:30 -0700 Received: from [172.16.1.8] ([68.218.232.170]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040702213808.CSHF1775.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.8]> for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:38:08 -0400 Subject: RE: [sitedocs] Reworking the docs From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List In-Reply-To: <777DDD941E46D41181B300508BAE014F091E7C78@synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com> References: <777DDD941E46D41181B300508BAE014F091E7C78@synntm8.mtl.optimumgroup.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088804441.18057.6.camel@fermi.trunk.joshua-tree.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 17:40:41 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 16:00, Tence, Vincent wrote: > Do we want to generate the maven project documentation (where project info > and project reports are located) for the master site or only for the > sub-projects sites? Hmm I don't know which would be best. Could we play and see what works better. We do need some whay to show things like API's and xref docs and so on. > If we specify in the sitedocs site properties: > maven.xdoc.includeProjectDocumentation = no > > then subprojects by default won't include the project documentation, unless > they redefine the property: > maven.xdoc.includeProjectDocumentation = yes Vince you seem to be all over this stuff. You can make the decisions since you've taken it on. Whatever approach you want to take is fine with me. And certainly feel free to ask for our opinions. Let me know where I can help out as well. Alex