From directory-dev-return-1464-apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sat Jun 12 01:43:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5097 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2004 01:43:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2004 01:43:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 13843 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2004 01:44:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13750 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2004 01:44:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Directory Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13736 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2004 01:44:05 -0000 Received: from [205.152.59.70] (HELO imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:44:05 -0700 Received: from [172.16.1.7] ([68.218.226.87]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040612014337.LJFC12800.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.7]> for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:43:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [snickers] Should we separate the BER Decoder from the digester? From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List In-Reply-To: <40C9E694.70100@videotron.ca> References: <40C9E694.70100@videotron.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1087004616.17881.3291.camel@newton> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:43:37 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ok, I guess we're going to have to do something about this then. Problem is I don't have much time to devote to it at the moment. If others would like to tackle this then feel free to go to town. On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 13:06, Vincent Tence wrote: > If bewildering means there are too much of them, I agree (English's not > my first language so I am guessing). Could we consolidate some of them > to lower the entry barrier - it's scary at the moment when you don't > know the internals ;-) > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > While the compiler will generate targeted digesters and that code may go > > away, I find the number of maven projects in this SVN repository > > bewildering. What do you think? > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:aok123@bellsouth.net] > >>Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 11:48 PM > >>To: directory-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>Subject: [snickers] Should we separate the BER Decoder from the > > > > digester? > > > >>Alan, > >> > >>What do you think about making the digester a separate maven project > >>from the decoder? I'm starting to think this may be a good route to > > > > go > > > >>for us since we may throw it away when your compiler is ready. Plus > > > > the > > > >>decoder is distinct and need not be cluttered by the digester code. > >> > >>Alex > > > > > >