Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84864 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2004 04:36:20 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2004 04:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 93943 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2004 04:35:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93851 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2004 04:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Directory Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93837 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2004 04:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.72) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2004 04:35:58 -0000 Received: from franklin ([68.218.145.45]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040407043608.TIXI1729.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@franklin> for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 00:36:08 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" To: "'Apache Directory Developers List'" Subject: RE: [vote] RMS - Realm Management System Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 00:36:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040407042917.THDZ1729.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@franklin> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcQb+IVUrPgHPcpOSYuc4UvUv0FmAAAAK6EgABea2iAAAGDDcA== Message-Id: <20040407043608.TIXI1729.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@franklin> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Oh and just to give you all an update of the voters that chimed in on the PPMC list here are the current votes: Noel +1 Jeff +1 Robb +1 Me +1 Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:aok123@bellsouth.net] > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:29 AM > To: 'Alex Karasulu'; 'Directory PPMC' > Subject: [vote] RMS - Realm Management System > > Hi, > > This is a repost of the original RMS email which got kicked off > somehow as vote on the PPMC list. We just want to make sure > everyone is considered before we close this vote and realized > that it actually belongs on the dev list. > > As most of you guys know some of us have been working on the Realm > Management System (RMS) over at source forge here: > > http://openrms.sourceforge.net > > The crew is basically composed of a subset of us and the project uses the > Apache Software License. > > This is a very high level framework for storing and managing relatively > static information within an application domain or realm in a directory. > It can store user's, groups and application permissions as well as > aspects of a user's profile that are unrelated to security. Basically > RMS is a place to centralize information that is shared and changes > relatively infrequently. > > The most obvious information it looks up is security information right > now, namely authentication and authorization information. It pluggable > and modular with GUI tools for managing these aspects of applications > within your operational environment. In this respect it handles, at a > high level, various identity management related tasks allowing for the > centralization and federation of identity. > > RMS is designed to sit on top of Janus and use any LDAP server. In fact > we are in the process of plugging in Janus under RMS to support various > low level operations and we are finding a high degree of overlap. We are > also noticing that the RMS project fits more in line with our endeavors > within the directory project. It will also be able to use Janus and other > API's to access static information stored perhaps in XML files. The > backing store will be completely pluggable. > > Currently I will be commissioned to work on this project pretty > aggressively for CitiStreet a CitiGroup company. In the hopes of > exploring the potential of using the code and having it synergize with our > efforts within the directory project I went ahead and requested the > submission of a Corporate CLA by CitiStreet and we have confirmation of it > being faxed in. This is a major feat btw to have such an entity be so > accepting of us and open source. > > I wanted to let you guys know about where things are with this project and > how much it overlaps with our goals. I would like to discuss its value > here and whether or not it's worth taking a vote to bring it on instead of > working separately on it. In a way I think it is going to be an extension > of Janus. > > Alex > >