Guys,

I personally feel that some votes should be deem sensitive as Nicola
says and should be hence kept on the ppmc list as well as certain kinds
of discussions.  I'd like to vote on the various topics that should be 
deemed sensitive and discussed on the ppmc list now before we get the 
list setup.  Note that some of these issues to be discussed will occur
when we graduate from the incubator:

Voting on comitters:
[X] sensitive
[ ] nonsensitive

Discussions about perspective committers:
[X] sensitive
[ ] nonsensitive

Voting on pmc nominees and pmc chairs:
[X] sensitive
[ ] nonsensitive

Discussions about perspective pmc nominees and pmc chairs:
[X] sensitive
[ ] nonsensitive

Discussions, confrontations and votes regarding the resolution of 
personality conflicts (should never get to this though):
[X] sensitive
[ ] nonsensitive

Alex

> 
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicolaken@apache.org>
> Date: 2004/01/13 Tue AM 02:30:47 EST
> To: Apache Directory Developers List <directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Status of the ppmc
> 
> 
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Alex,
> > 
> > If I am not mistaken, a PPMC is essentially automatic for a project.  I can
> > create the mailing list for the PPMC, but most things can (and should) be
> > done on -dev.
> > 
> > Nicola Ken?
> 
> Correct.
> 
> Create a ppmc mailing list, but all general discussion should happen on 
> public lists. Voting in a committer is deemed as a sensitive (hence ppmc 
> list only) by some ASF projects, and non-sensitive (ie public) by 
> others, so this community has to choose how to handle it (the best thing 
> is to do a has always been the case for the project).
> 
> -- 
> Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
>              - verba volant, scripta manent -
>     (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>