Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28256 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 15:35:15 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 15:35:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 22909 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 15:34:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22844 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 15:34:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Directory Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22818 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 15:34:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 15:34:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 28223 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 15:35:13 -0000 Received: from host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it (HELO apache.org) (80.204.154.190) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 15:35:13 -0000 Message-ID: <3FCE01E7.8020608@apache.org> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:31:51 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031119 Thunderbird/0.4a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Directory IRC channel on irc.freenode.net References: <3FCCEF340011175C@mail-3.tiscali.it> (added by postmaster@mail-3.tiscali.it) In-Reply-To: <3FCCEF340011175C@mail-3.tiscali.it> (added by postmaster@mail-3.tiscali.it) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Paul Bonkowski wrote: ... > I agree with Nicola on the logging. But if we do log the very most we should keep the log > as archive only not posted. On the chance that something we need happens on the channel. Mine was just a suggestion, not a policy. In any case, logging but not publishing the logs on a website (or at least not linking ir referencing them) should be just fine. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------