directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <aok...@bellsouth.net>
Subject RE: [naming] Commons sources imported
Date Mon, 15 Dec 2003 01:51:51 GMT
Just an FYI we used org.apache.eve for the server's package
base.  Did not want the extra directory part.

Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil@steitz.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:36 PM
> To: Apache Directory Developers List
> Subject: Re: [naming] Commons sources imported
> 
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> 
> >
> > naming appears to be a separate module as such in cvs parlance in that
> the
> > trunk/tags/branches go inside naming and not inside directory. Not a
> > problem for Apache repo's, but at work I like to have a HEAD/<module>
> > rather than <module>/HEAD.
> 
> I was just imitating the examples in the svn docs, and the way that the
> ldap module is set up.
> 
> >
> > Looking in naming, the first look I've reallly done since Phil shifted
> > things around, my first thought is that 'core' is a bad name to choose.
> > Too many Unix-C issues, but not a biggy.
> 
> Agreed.  Any other suggestions?  Also, I am not sure that the division is
> right -- esp. the location of the resources classes. Pls review and
> comment.
> 
> One more thing.  I am starting to have angst about having used the package
> names "org.apache.directory.naming" instead of just "org.apache.naming."
> What is your opinion on this?
> 
> Phil
> 




Mime
View raw message