directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wes McKean <wmck...@logictrends.com>
Subject Re: [eve] Event Manager
Date Fri, 05 Dec 2003 15:01:27 GMT
Unfortunately, this list is already generating tons of mail, and I just don't 
have the time to read it as thoroughly as I like :-)  If you, Alex, or Vince 
already has stuff done, then by all means, let's use it.  I don't want to 
re-invent the wheel more than three times.

Wes

On Thursday 04 December 2003 11:51 pm, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> I'm a little dense.  It's cool I don't mind reworking it
> and I'm sure Wes would like that.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:43 PM
> > To: Apache Directory Developers List
> > Subject: RE: [eve] Event Manager
> >
> > > In the beginning I thought it was do-able since the project uses
> > > the Apache license and all the members were Apache people or about
> > > to be Apache people but I should stop presuming things.
> >
> > Actually, I read Brian's message as saying that because they used the
> > Apache
> > license without changing the name, we could use it.  Also, if all of the
> > people had signed CLAs (or do sign), we'd be fine, too.  The exposure
> > would
> > be from someone who contributed code without a CLA, and then decides to
> >
> > complain later.  As Brian said:
> > > Therefore: if the license on d-haven really is either the Apache
> > > License or a name-replaced equivalent, it is not mandatory to get CLAs
> > > from
> >
> > every
> >
> > > contributor.  It is *preferred* that we get those, so as to provide a
> > > second layer of defense should anyone make noise about it.
> >
> > So your example above would allow re-use.
> >
> > 	--- Noel


Mime
View raw message