directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vincent Tence <>
Subject RE: [eve] Event Manager
Date Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:04:21 GMT
I am not really aware of licensing stuff obviously. I think Berin and I
have been the only contributors to that code, but as Alex said, it's
pretty small and straightforward anyway. The most value lies in the
javadoc (2 or 3 times more doc than code I guess). Is there any issue
copying the doc?

- Vincent

On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 04:43, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > In the beginning I thought it was do-able since the project uses
> > the Apache license and all the members were Apache people or about
> > to be Apache people but I should stop presuming things.
> Actually, I read Brian's message as saying that because they used the Apache
> license without changing the name, we could use it.  Also, if all of the
> people had signed CLAs (or do sign), we'd be fine, too.  The exposure would
> be from someone who contributed code without a CLA, and then decides to
> complain later.  As Brian said:
> > Therefore: if the license on d-haven really is either the Apache License
> > or a name-replaced equivalent, it is not mandatory to get CLAs from every
> > contributor.  It is *preferred* that we get those, so as to provide a
> > second layer of defense should anyone make noise about it.
> So your example above would allow re-use.
> 	--- Noel

View raw message