Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1309 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 07:09:55 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 07:09:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 1711 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2003 07:09:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1669 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2003 07:09:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Directory Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1656 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 07:09:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 07:09:32 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.2.0-dev) with SMTP ID 115 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:09:42 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: RE: Logo Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:09:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3FCAC04B.50709@steitz.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > Huh? From where did you get the idea that the Tree of Knowledge implies any > > sort of pre-determined, written-in-stone, anything? > The Christian scholastic tradition started by Thomas Acquinas and > continuing through the Rationalists, e.g. DesCartes: > Sorry to be culturally myopic... Replied off-list. >>>part of what Eve is enabling is lots of distributed trees >>>instead of one great big central "definitive source." > > > Yes ... and one of the interesting ideas that just popped into mind is the > > Aspen tree. Aspen would be an interesting name, too. Why? An entire > > Aspen grove is actually one tree. > Yeah. This is good. That's like the Sierpinski triangle, though using > trees, which is better. Apache Aspen ... Aggregated Scalable Pipelined Extensible Networks ;-) --- Noel