Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <3FB888B5.2060207@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:37:09 +0100
From: Stephen McConnell <mcconnell@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Noel J. Bergman" <noel@devtech.com>
CC: directory-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CVS layout
References: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPAEEPFGAB.noel@devtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPAEEPFGAB.noel@devtech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Noel J. Bergman wrote:

>>My preference would be to be able to checkout a langauge specific tree.
>>For example:
>>   directory/java
>>   directory/c
>>However, It's not so clear to what the product breakout is at the top
>>level
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Can anyone provide a summary of the main projects (i.e. ldap,...).
>>    
>>
>
>Now or in the future?  In large measure because this is intended to be a
>TLP, and the list of sub-projects is almost certain to grow over time.  I
>think it makes sense to organize by component rather than language.
>

What I'm digging at is the question of granularity.  Break out langauge 
at a fine grain component granularity would IMO be a mistake (or at 
least a unnecessary development overhead).  But breaking out at the 
level of subprojects would make sense.

Stephen.

>
>	--- Noel
>
>
>  
>

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:mcconnell@apache.org

|------------------------------------------------|
| Magic by Merlin                                |
| Production by Avalon                           |
|                                                |
| http://avalon.apache.org/merlin                |
| http://dpml.net/                               |
|------------------------------------------------|