Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
From: <aok123@bellsouth.net>
To: "Noel J. Bergman" <noel@devtech.com>,"Stephen McConnell"
 <mcconnell@apache.org>,<directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: RE: CVS layout
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:33:15 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: 
 <20031117233315.TFYA6276.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net>

I agree with keeping it at a 'component' or subproject level.  In this light I presume each subproject can use the appropriate tools from their language specific domain.  So rather than having a language specific root that builds the subprojects in one fashion I think each project should provide its own project descriptor what ever that may be.

> 
> From: "Noel J. Bergman" <noel@devtech.com>
> Date: 2003/11/17 Mon AM 02:51:07 EST
> To: "Stephen McConnell" <mcconnell@apache.org>, 
>         <directory-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: CVS layout
> 
> > My preference would be to be able to checkout a langauge specific tree.
> > For example:
> >    directory/java
> >    directory/c
> > However, It's not so clear to what the product breakout is at the top
> > level
> 
> > Can anyone provide a summary of the main projects (i.e. ldap,...).
> 
> Now or in the future?  In large measure because this is intended to be a
> TLP, and the list of sub-projects is almost certain to grow over time.  I
> think it makes sense to organize by component rather than language.
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 
>