From directory-dev-return-69-apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Nov 25 12:57:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64670 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2003 12:57:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2003 12:57:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 52558 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2003 12:57:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-directory-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52518 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2003 12:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact directory-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Directory Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52487 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2003 12:57:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO logictrends.com) (64.190.71.44) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2003 12:57:34 -0000 Received: from 192.168.123.110 [66.20.187.4] by logictrends.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id A36BABBF0288; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:04:43 -0500 From: Wes McKean Organization: Logic Trends To: directory-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Serverside NIO: Not ready for Prime Time Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:56:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311250756.34066.wmckean@logictrends.com> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Folks! I was running ldapd on a Windows XP box with the new server side NIO stuff included, and I was getting all kinds of weird messages inside the sun implementation classes. The same exact code works fine under Linux. It is my professional opinion that there are some issues with the Windows XP implementation of non-blocking sockets, and we couldn't put this stuff into the server until these issues are addressed. I fully expect the issues to be my fault :-) Wes