directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@finemaltcoding.com>
Subject Re: Rethink Subversion
Date Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:27:19 GMT
+1 from me, meaning I'm willing to help ease those growing pains.  I spoke about 
this a bit with Alex at ApacheCon, and he also seemed very interested in trying 
out Subversion.


Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> +1 from me, too.  And I say that knowing full well that we will have some
> growing pains with Subversion.
> 
> I am cc'ing Greg and the infrastructure folks to give them a heads up that
> we may need some help ASAP to get started, if no one objects to using
> Subversion.
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Machols [mailto:jmachols@comcast.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 13:10
> To: Apache Directory Developers List
> Subject: Rethink Subversion
> 
> 
> Guys,
> 
> I know we talked about this before, but I think we should think about
> using subversion instead of CVS for the directory project.  The benefits
> are becoming apparent now.  Right off the bat it will help with the
> migration from source forge, plus the advantages of the Meta-data and
> atomic check-ins.  I know there may be a small learning curve, but I
> would rather do this now when we are changing infrastructure anyway,
> than have to go through this in the future when we are worried more
> important things: the releases, code, etc.
> 
> So I am a +1 to use Subversion instead of CVS.
> 
> Jeff



Mime
View raw message