directory-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From smckin...@apache.org
Subject directory-fortress-realm git commit: last of the readme cleanup
Date Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:24:21 GMT
Repository: directory-fortress-realm
Updated Branches:
  refs/heads/master 972e616ed -> dda08be8f


last of the readme cleanup


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/directory-fortress-realm/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/directory-fortress-realm/commit/dda08be8
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/directory-fortress-realm/tree/dda08be8
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/directory-fortress-realm/diff/dda08be8

Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: dda08be8fa6b6bc1dd03dbff65f37f6081861115
Parents: 972e616
Author: Shawn McKinney <smckinney@apache.org>
Authored: Sat Jan 23 15:28:30 2016 -0600
Committer: Shawn McKinney <smckinney@apache.org>
Committed: Sat Jan 23 15:28:30 2016 -0600

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 README.md | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/directory-fortress-realm/blob/dda08be8/README.md
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 5b1b3c5..6697bb8 100755
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -92,15 +92,15 @@ There are two options for web app usage.  The first, pulls extra dependencies
on
 
 ### Table of Options
 
-There are pros and cons for each.  Option 1 requires its web app's to be dependent on the
fortress realm but enables programmatic invocation of the security apis for fine-grained checking.
 On the other hand Option 2
-keeps the app free of entanglement with fortress, which is generally easier to manage, but
limits its capabilities to Java EE security semantics.
-
- ```
- | Realm Type || Is Web App Dependent? | Is Declarative?| Is Programmatic?| Is Global Security?|
- |------------||-----------------------|----------------|-----------------|--------------------|
- |Option 1    ||          Yes          |       Yes      |        Yes      |         No  
      |
- |Option 2    ||          No           |       Yes      |        No       |         Yes 
      |
- ```
+There are pros and cons of each.  Option 1 requires web apps to be dependent on the fortress
realm jars but enables RBAC programmatic authZ.  Option 2, on the other hand,
+frees the app of entanglement with fortress, which is easier to manage, but limits capabilities
to Java EE security semantics.
+
+```
+|Realm Type||Is Web App Dependent?|Is Declarative?|Is Programmatic?|Is Global Security?|
+|----------||---------------------|---------------|----------------|-------------------|
+| Option 1 ||         Yes         |      Yes      |       Yes      |        No         |
+| Option 2 ||         No          |      Yes      |       No       |        Yes        |
+```
 
 ### Option 1. For Single Web Context
  *enable Java EE security for a single web app running under Tomcat*


Mime
View raw message