Mailing-List: contact commits-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@directory.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Apache Wiki <wikidiffs@apache.org>
To: directory-cvs@incubator.apache.org
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:55:28 -0000
Message-ID: <20070215235528.11579.39108@eos.apache.osuosl.org>
Subject: [Directory Wiki] Update of "MinaPerformance" by CKoppelt

Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Directory Wiki" for change notification.

The following page has been changed by CKoppelt:
http://wiki.apache.org/directory/MinaPerformance

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- == Performance Tips ==
+ deleted
  
- Strangely, some modern JVMs seem to perform better with heap buffers than with direct buffers.  Try to set the buffers to be allocated as heap buffers by default:
- 
- {{{
- ByteBuffer.setUseDirectBuffers( false );
- }}}
- 
- 
- If you decided to use heap buffers by default, you'd better change the default {{{ByteBufferAllocator}}} to {{{SimpleByteBufferAllocator}}} for even higher performance.  The default allocator, {{{PooledByteBufferAllocator}}}, was created because allocating a direct buffer takes a lot of time comparing to the case of a heap buffer.
- 
- {{{
- ByteBuffer.setAllocator(new SimpleByteBufferAllocator());
- }}}
- 
- Additionally, you can adjust the size of the eden (the heap area for young objects in a JVM).  It is known that about 30% of the maximum heap size will be OK in general.  For example:
- 
- {{{
- java -Xmx1024m -XX:NewSize=300m
- }}}
- 
- == Impressive Performance Stories ==
- 
- Please post your success story on performance.  We'll move your testimonials here to [http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/mina/testimonials.html our web site] periodically.
-