Mailing-List: contact api-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: api@directory.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pajbam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Subject: Re: Parsing response control
From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net>
In-Reply-To: <f10c7be19b4e1be565a444b7d9154ba5@linagora.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:13:37 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C1C9DFB9-C05D-4527-A0D7-FA8BAB86CE16@marcelot.net>
References: <5f0cfd7923ab9f90724050867a2f8755@linagora.com>
 <527C673E-2A48-4419-91F2-D15766B1B910@marcelot.net>
 <B8E0C41E-749F-4CD4-8A22-D9245EF39C88@marcelot.net>
 <f10c7be19b4e1be565a444b7d9154ba5@linagora.com>
To: api@directory.apache.org,
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Ouazana-Sustowski?= <raphael.ouazana@linagora.com>

Cool. :)

Thanks for letting us know.

The "system property solution" needs to be set very early (before the =
LDAP API Service is first initialized), while the =
"service.registerControl(=85) solution" is a little more flexible and =
can be set at any point in time (of course it will only work for =
responses received after it has been configured).

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

On 14 juin 2012, at 14:50, Rapha=EBl Ouazana-Sustowski wrote:

> Thank you very much, both ways finally work fine if I use them early =
enough.
>=20
> By both ways I mean with System.setProperty and with registerControl.
>=20
> Regards,
> Rapha=EBl Ouazana.
>=20
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:41:54 +0200, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>> Small mistake in the previous code.
>>=20
>> This should work much better (variable naming was not consistent):
>>> LdapApiService ldapApiService =3D =
LdapApiServiceFactory.getSingleton();
>>>=20
>>> ControlFactory<?, ?> factory =3D new SyncStateValueFactory( =
ldapApiService );
>>> ldapApiService.registerControl( factory );
>>=20
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>=20
>> On 14 juin 2012, at 14:36, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi Rapha=EBl,
>>>=20
>>> I'm not sure it will work but you could try to configure the LDAP =
API service with the following code:
>>>> LdapApiService ldapApiService =3D =
LdapApiServiceFactory.getSingleton();
>>>>=20
>>>> ControlFactory<?, ?> factory =3D new SyncStateValueFactory( codec =
);
>>>> codec.registerControl( factory );
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> You need to insert that before sending or receiving any data.
>>> It should make the LDAP API Service aware of the =
SyncStateValueControl and allow to create the correct instances of it.
>>>=20
>>> Let us know if it succeeds (or not).
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>>=20
>>> On 14 juin 2012, at 14:02, Rapha=EBl Ouazana-Sustowski wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Hi,
>>>>=20
>>>> I'm using ApacheDS API to implement a SyncRepl client.
>>>> When I receive a Response, I get a BasicControlDecorator which =
decorates an OpaqueControl, instead of a SyncStateValueControl.
>>>>=20
>>>> Reading code, it seems I should load ExtrasBundleActivator, but I =
don't know how I can do that.
>>>> Else I tried:
>>>>=20
>>>> System.setProperty(
>>>> 	StandaloneLdapApiService.DEFAULT_CONTROLS_LIST,
>>>> 	=
"org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.syncrepl_impl.SyncStateV=
alueFactory"
>>>> 	);
>>>>=20
>>>> Which has been indicated here: =
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-api/201106.mbox/%3CBANL=
kTikTTQLfM4eFxtATnzh%2BYFPPXoNQUA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>>=20
>>>> But this does not seem to work.
>>>>=20
>>>> How can I get a correctly parsed response control?
>>>>=20
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rapha=EBl Ouazana.
>>>=20
>=20