directory-api mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot ...@marcelot.net>
Subject Re: LDAP filter
Date Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:09:30 GMT
Thanks very much Sébastien!

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud


On 21 nov. 2011, at 22:55, Sébastien Bahloul wrote:

> Hi Pierre-Arnaud,
> 
> I've just created it as you've proposed:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-64

> 
> Regards, 
> -- 
> Sebastien BAHLOUL
> IAM / Security specialist
> Ldap Synchronization Connector : http://lsc-project.org
> Blog : http://sbahloul.wordpress.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 2011/11/18 Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net>
> Hi Sébastien,
> 
> I guess you refer to a filter like:
> attr=value
> instead of:
> (attr=value)
> 
> At the moment, the parser will complain because, as you said, it follows the standards.
> But, it might be a good thing to relax it a little to accept those kinds of simplified
'hacked' filters.
> Since the API's goal is to facilitate LDAP, I think you're right and it makes sense.
> 
> It would be great to create a JIRA issue about it.
> 
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
> 
> On 17 nov. 2011, at 23:49, Sébastien Bahloul wrote:
> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> In the API, is there a way to accept simple filters that don't start and
>> end with parenthesis ? I understand that this is closer to the standards
>> but it's quite disturbing for people switching from other APIs or that used
>> mostly other vendors products that don't require such format ?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sebastien BAHLOUL
>> IAM / Security specialist
>> Ldap Synchronization Connector : http://lsc-project.org
>> Blog : http://sbahloul.wordpress.com/
> 
> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message