directory-api mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <>
Subject Re: [Shared] API Design Questionnaire #1
Date Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:17:49 GMT
On 1/29/11 10:38 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>> [X] - (c)
>>             interface                                 = AddRequest
>>             simple API exposed implementation         = AddRequest*Impl*
>>             not so simple internal use implementation = AddRequest*Decoder*
>> We're applying option 'C' right now. I'm torn but think A might suite us
>> better for the long term, and for any situation. You also know what's an
>> interface and what's not although the IDE automatically shows you this stuff
>> on the package/class browser.
> This is my opinion for a low-level API, which 1:1 maps LDAP
> terminology to the Java API. I think we should additional have a
> simplified API where the user don't need to deal with request and
> response objects at all.
> BTW: We have this discussion again and again ;-) We really need to
> decide a consistent naming.

I think we already discussed it more than once, and we all agreed on 
this convention.

I'm not sure we want to rehash this again every 2 years :/

Emmanuel L├ęcharny

View raw message