Mailing-List: contact api-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: api@directory.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates
 209.85.218.217 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vxjlLXE9uKnXKjPTbBi8Jl0wx/0FKa5fkEBlxKELDJlZh9Z4gPPM3ahlLz8YSxltIx
         P38PuQEL4g9abF/kIwO8C1N5wpCiTM/IQOd0UIpcGlw4LLObGKb3/FcapDE+6VmnWnV5
         O/JS5j4KoALodlxXlpkmq5km+AstCo2NEV3n4=
Message-ID: <4B9CDE2D.9020406@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:01:33 +0100
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: api@directory.apache.org
Subject: Re: About exceptions
References: <4B9A1FE4.4040909@gmail.com> <4B9C9D0E.8070400@apache.org>
 <4B9CB2EA.2080400@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B9CB2EA.2080400@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 3/14/10 10:56 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>
> from the recent experience of migrating test cases to client-api
> have observed that unlike jndi we return result codes and I liked this
> (the jndi exceptions rather give me a feeling like 'use exceptions for 
> control flow', which is considered as a bad practice by many)
>
> so +1 for returning result codes instead of exceptions
Yes, that's pretty obvious we should do that.

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L�charny
www.nextury.com