Mailing-List: contact api-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: api@directory.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yaragallamurali@gmail.com
 designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index
         :content-language;
        b=RvmuQVRlnriNHHodiSILs91NL1h5/yYdWbXR9XAmOseD2c1dvlRSq+Fipm6sPqSwNk
         /G9+7U3jlHKuu3uFp1s8N4dPE3KnYntw0HjaqHJIPWDg7Y4hHg1yhQP4YaKp4/bbYPCa
         OvSSQBOFkxJ5q/VtbYhpKdpx2VEAQKH81LsXY=
From: "Muralidhar Yaragalla" <yaragallamurali@gmail.com>
To: <api@directory.apache.org>,
	<elecharny@apache.org>
References: <001601cac8fe$cbec7480$63c55d80$@com>
 <4BA64717.7090009@gmail.com>	 <002001cac92a$7f1e1dd0$7d5a5970$@com>
 <4BA675B4.2020107@apache.org>	 <002701cac92f$be8c92d0$3ba5b870$@com>
 <1cbc90c11003220109m5a2811cbn92cf2b87332d087c@mail.gmail.com>
 <001e01cac9fd$79b25680$6d170380$@com> <4BA7DDE8.7050507@gmail.com>
 <002701cacab5$67e08860$37a19920$@com> <4BA9080C.3090301@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BA9080C.3090301@apache.org>
Subject: RE: Where can I get IntialContextFactory?
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:17:31 +0530
Message-ID: <002d01cacab9$4fe0bf10$efa23d30$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
thread-index: AcrKtouxbBQOlLz+Qu+81m5fWg1R4QAAg6eA
Content-Language: en-us

Sure. Even when I asked the question I tried to be but I don=92t know =
where it
went wrong. Instead of messing when the mail is not understood, asking =
for
more clarification on the point what you did not understand would be the
best way of dealing with this kind of situations.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel L=E9charny [mailto:elecharny@apache.org]=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 11:57 PM
To: api@directory.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where can i get IntialContextFactory?

On 3/23/10 7:19 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla wrote:
> Thank you so much.
>   =20
I re-read the thread, and it might be seen as rude. Let's cleanup the=20
mess a bit :
- sorry that your first mail was not clear enough for us, and sorry for=20
the tone we used
- we were just in the middle of a huge release of ADS, most certainly a=20
good timing for such questions, and certainly not a good timing for such =

answers

Ok, so my apologies. No need to call us names, we probably don't even=20
know why we switched to such a tone, but eh, sometime we just don't have =

time to be smart !

I will just ask you as a favor to be very precise when you have a=20
question, so that we don't enter in such a loop.

Thanks !

--=20
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L=E9charny
www.nextury.com