directmemory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Board report for directmemory
Date Tue, 03 Sep 2013 01:27:36 GMT
Thanks for listening to our grumpiness! ;-)
On Sep 2, 2013 12:24 PM, "Raffaele P. Guidi" <raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Fine - we will definitely collect our thoughts and put together a more
> accurate report for next board meeting. Thanks for clarifying and pointing
> this out.
>
> Regards,
>     Raffaele
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
>> <raffaele.p.guidi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Ok, good to know, we'll try to expand on that, then, but, of course the
>> real
>> > problem is that DirectMemory has not any corporate sponsorship and is a
>> tool
>> > that addresses a niche requirement (applications that cope with HUGE
>> > quantities of RAM). Not having a large diffusion it of course limits the
>> > number of developers interested in contributing....
>>
>> Having that kind of info in the board report is much better than the
>> terse report that we received: it tells the board that the
>> DirectMemory PMC is aware of the relative slowness of the project, and
>> either doesn't think any actions are required at the moment, or thinks
>> that things will slowly improve.
>>
>> As a board member, my main question when I read a project's report is
>> "is this project viable or is it in trouble" - making us aware of
>> *why* you think your project currently has little activity, and if you
>> think this is a problem or not, helps.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message